Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Karkkainen's avatar

I think it’s a mistake to characterize this ICJ decision as an “advisory opinion”. That goes to the nature of international law. International legal obligations are considered “binding as a matter of international law” whether or not there are effective enforcement mechanisms, which frequently are absent. However, an ICJ decision is, strictu sensu, binding only on the parties to that particular dispute, and carries only persuasive weight in subsequent international adjudications or in the domestic courts of any country. Nonetheless, international lawyers, legal scholars, most governments, and subsequent arbitral tribunals tend to take ICJ decisions very seriously as evidence of applicable legal standards. They are thus more than mere “advice”; they’re about as weighty as international law ever gets. The lack of enforceability of international law is, however, a chronic and pervasive limitation on its effectiveness.

Expand full comment
Arden's avatar

Re: What you can do (support startups) - I like this because it goes beyond donating, clicking, or writing decision-makers. Importantly, it can get activists personally involved with one or more small startups - a wonderful spirit-lifter.

Any more on how we can get involved with appropriate startups and offer resources (test space, skills, etc.)?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts