Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex M's avatar
41mEdited

Katharine, i want to ask, if we accept that emissions cuts won’t stabilize the jet stream such that the heat domes we face aren’t any less severe than they are today (they occur as early as march to as late as October), should we really assume that we can adapt to this happening in perpetuity? We can and should plant trees, and utilize reflective material as well as passive cooling and all of that (including air conditioning/heat pumps, and overhauling our power grids to support constant demand), but this only can do so much in a heat domes where it gets extremely humid and does not cool off at night. Heat domes already can and often do reach the arctic circle, which obviously melts more ice and permafrost and further dries out boreal forests (which is one of the planets largest carbon sinks) leading to megafires that pollute the entire northern hemisphere with toxic smoke all summer long (these fires are overwhelmingly started by lightning strikes engendered by the atmospheric instability due to the wavy jet stream). I’m curious if there is anything that can be done to adress problems like Arctic Sea Ice melt and jet stream irregularities at the source (beyond cutting emissions) because I fear that emissions cuts alone will not suffice at restoring this (arctic ice provides an albedo effect that reflects solar radiation back into space, and as that has melted, that has destabilized the jet stream and meridional tempature gradients). I’m not trying to imply we’re doomed, i just wanted to add my perspective here.

No posts

Ready for more?